“The Language of God” - What a "God's-eye" view (or "Eagle's-eye" view, if you prefer) would look like. Perhaps something like (but still far inferior from) a way in which we would communicate from such a vantage-point.

Uniting some thoughts expressed previously as part of the "descendent knowledge domains returning to revitalize philosophy" methodology.

**Metaphysical Linguism**- The doctrine that there are only*language systems*. Language systems do not*frame metaphysical debates*, rather metaphysics (the study of reality) is ultimately*the study of language systems*. I will discuss further what this conception of a*language system*is so that the immediate incredulity this thesis likely engenders, falls away.**Simple hieroglyphic-like**writing language.**Clarifying some ways of thinking about metaphysics**in philosophy..*Rechender Raum*

These are the building blocks of **3DL**:

**Predicates**or**Types**: a pre-defined list of Euclidean geometric structures.**Spaces**: 3-Dimensional Euclidean**Spaces**here.**Instances**: a "copy" or instantiation of a**Predicate**located in a**Space**.**Propositions**: temporal ordering of concatenated**Spaces**- a 4-Dimensional world line.

A **Predicate**, a **Type**, is a 3-Dimensional entity which is instanced by being placed into a 3-Dimensional **Space**.

For those familiar with philosophical metaphysics or those familiar with software tools like AutoCAD (where a GUI with pattern **Types** are “dragged onto” a canvas to create a specific “copy”).

This should come as no surprise since such visualization tools and their attendant programming languages are

meta-languagesfor a host of language families.

All of

set theorycan be expressed in English and Microsoft Word, all ofcategory theorycan be expressed in Draw.io, etc.

This is the very definition of a

meta-language- a top-level language within which more-specific languages can be built (whether combinations of pixels, fragments of a language, new math theories, etc.). It's a mathematical property of these tools that contributes to their wide-spread use and flexibility - particularly for creatives.

In this language, people communicate by concatenating sequences of **Spaces** forming **Propositions**.

Each 3-Dimensional **Space** is a set of 2-Dimensional pointless topologies. Each 2-Dimensional space is written using ** Connection Theory**.

Tense is captured by natural orderings (temporal sequences) of each 3-Dimensional **Space**.

Formally, a quick sketch of the **lexicon** of **3DL**:

**Types**: a geometric, mathematical, object defined independently of the**Spaces**and**Temporal Orderings**. Free-standing, and separated from the assertions made in**3DL**. They can be expressed in their own sub-fragment, meta-language, etc.**Instances**: are**Type**copies positioned or situated in a**Space**.**Spaces**: are concatenated into sequences which form natural**Temporal Orderings**.- A
**Frame of Reference**is a set of**Propositions**or**Temporal Orderings**.

The

grammarof3DL: Combinations ofTypesasInstancesinSpaces.

The

semanticsof3DL: The truth of aProposition`P`

is given by itsinvariancewith orisomorphismto otherPropositions`R`

,`Q`

,`N`

, ...

- Non-Eternalist Logic
- Non-Eternalist Logic #2
- Transactional Logic
- Logical Module
- Dimensional and Hyper-Dimensional Logics
- Dimensional and Hyper-Dimensional Logics #2
- Language of God
- Propositional Stability and Cohen Forcing

##### post: 11/14/2018

##### update: 1/21/2020

##### update: 1/23/2020

##### update: 4/20/2020